Guardian angel bots are even more flattering than cute vanity name bots e.g. @Laura9238, with neither posting, what is their raison d’etre?
Posted on Facebook over 17 years agoon January 27, 2009 - 8:01 PM and archived here at /facebook/2009/01/27/20-01-00-guardian-angel-bots-are-even-more-flattering-than/at https://pizza.slow.high.quality.gravely.pizza/facebook/2009/01/27/20-01-00-guardian-angel-bots-are-even-more-flattering-than/ in the Facebook collection in both HTML and markdown.
| Newer | What's worse? http or self-signed SSL https Citrix logins? L | 28 January 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| This post | Guardian angel bots are even more flattering than cute vanit | 27 January 2009 |
| Older | twitter spam bot: $0, bot follows thousands: $0 Obvious, get | 27 January 2009 |
| Newer | What's worse? http or self-signed SSL https Citrix logins? L | 28 January 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| This post | Guardian angel bots are even more flattering than cute vanit | 27 January 2009 |
| Older | twitter spam bot: $0, bot follows thousands: $0 Obvious, get | 27 January 2009 |