at the picture shop a few days ago getting a julian lage sf jazz residency poster framed (I caught the solo acoustic show and the duo with marc ribot, who is just the coolest š) and while I was trying to decide on a ready-made or not, the other table became the center of attention w/a full size (huge) star wars poster, which looked mint.
the owner helping him says he worked at lucasfilm in the 80s and that this was one of two sizes or something? he was very excited
at least a band famously hostile to tapers (or passive to Peter Grant) and infamously noted for onion-on-belt songwriting credit lag didnāt profit off of tapers I guess? weird decisions.
also, it is full of stock footage cultural contextualization, which, as a device, ugh, the worst dreck of romanticism imo.
the high school fan in me was pretty disappointed w/ the ābecoming led zeppelin" thing that just came out. I bailed.
the second half is full of neat ā68, '69, and ā70 film of the band live, but not with the definitely available and in some cases highly regarded audio of those shows. Instead, studio or bbc session releases for completely different songs, and not even particularly good songs were used.
"Living Loving Maidā, to pick one they used, sucks, and was never in their actual live sets.
half way through nabokovās āpale fireā and istg every aside story in the commentary about stuff in zembla reads like a wes anderson scene